Archive for: March, 2007

Bong! Swish.

Mar 30 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Lexpionage

How are they your words? I suppose they’re not really, except you keep coming back for them, every Friday. You know you love it. Don’t front.

But really, they’re our words. Your love of words is just one of the things I love about you.

So, our words this week are:

  • Deliquescent
  • Plangent

Deliquescent means, essentially, like it’s melting. To deliquesce is to become liquid by absorbing moisture from the air or to become fluid in the process of maturing– like what happens to a plum you leave in the bottom of the fridge for six months. Plangent means ringing, as in a bell, especially plaintively. Its root is in the Latin word for lament.

Both words are entirely new to me this week, and that was pretty exciting. And since I have to cut this short, I’m-a send you on a wild goose chase. I read these words within 20 pages of one another in the same book. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to either a) guess what book this is or b) tell me two new words to you that you found within 20 pages of the same book.

Also, no going to Honu Girl for the book, since I spent most of the week chattering at her about it.

10 responses so far

The Immaculate Hack

Mar 29 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Geekery, Speechifying

Finally, MySpace proves its marginal usefulness by giving John McCain an artificial lifestyle-tolerance implant. The mastery of Mike D.’s hack should be legend. We can put up pictures of dying kittens with captions about hotlinking all day long, but it will never, ever be as effective as hitting a leech right where it feeds.

I get sorta worried, though, thinking that right now, deep inside the McCain camp, the legislative lapdogs are trying to figure out a way to legislate their behavior into correctness or legislate Mike D.’s behavior into illegality. Like this is just the Big Bad Series of Tubes showing that it needs to be controlled by the government. How come the clue bat always backfires?

8 responses so far

A Locket With an Emerald S

Mar 28 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Fandom

The artwork for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is now up and eager for us to begin deconstructing it!

There are three separate covers: the U.S. Edition, the Bloomsbury (UK) children’s edition, and the Bloomsbury adult edition. I really, really wish they’d make the adult covers available in the U.S. as well– they’re so much cooler than the pastel art. So click that link up there and let’s take a look.

The U.S. Edition seems to be the simplest, with the front and back covers forming a seamless picture of Harry and who/what must be Voldemort. They’re reaching, or grabbing? But for what? The same thing? And Harry’s wearing something around his neck– the RAB Locket horcrux? And they’re in some sort of ampitheatre? Or a graveyard surrounded by a circle of standing stones? A great picture, certainly, but it doesn’t tell us much.

And the UK Adult edition? Is a big love letter to all us adult fans everywhere. S for Snake? S for Slytherin? S for Severus “Badass Motherf*cker” Snape, more like. It’s the RAB locket, no doubt, and but I’m sure it’s supposed to say something new. Just need to listen to it more, I guess.

The Bloomsbury children’s edition is richest in info– the whole trio on the cover, looking like they’re being sucked into a vortex of jewels, cups, shields, and armor. Upon seeing that, I’m going to back the Arthurian Legend horse in the race toward completion and say that the final four horcruxes* will be the Treasures of the Tuatha De Danaan. The diary is destroyed, and so is the Peverell ring. The locket is identified and once somebody makes Mundungus Fletcher go get it back from whomever he sold it too, that’ll go too. Which leaves the trio to find the remaining four– the symbols of the Four Founders:

  1. Hufflepuff’s cup: The Cauldron
  2. Gryffindor’s sword: The Sword
  3. Ravenclaw’s wand: The Spear
  4. Slytherin’s ???: The Stone

I’m reaching here a bit, for the sake of getting this up and getting some discussion going. It’s possible that Slytherin’s ring is the Founder Horcrux representing the stone– it was described as a stone, rather than a jewel, or maybe the jewels in the locket that are shaped like an “S” (!!!) are those stones. I’m also wondering how that works, since Slytherin is not the house usually associated with stone. Of the four magical elements each represents, Hufflepuff is stone (or earth) and Slytherin is water. So the ring might still be Tom Riddle’s “family” horcrux– something to bind him to his amazing, and amazingly inbred, ancestry.

Regardless, a good start, don’t you think? They know the last known location of the cup. T hey’ve seen Godric Gryffindor’s sword before. Rowena Ravenclaw’s wand is lying on a dusty purple pillow in the front window at Ollivander’s, which is why he high-tailed it out of there. And power-hungry Slytherin loved those of great ambition… as evidence by their love of gaudy jewelry?

Past the speculation though, what the hell is holding the sword? WHAT THE HELL IS HOLDING IT? At first I thought it was Ron’s hand and I was all, “Go Ron! Tactician! Finally!” And then I realized, no, there’s something else back there with pointy fingers and pointy ears and gray white skin and if Dobby saves the day, I will very, very put out. In fact, Dobby not saving the day has just ascended to number two in my List of Wishes for Book Seven, right behind Please Don’t Kill Snape I Love Him Thank You.

It’s not long now. It should never get here, but it can’t come soon enough. What are you seeing? What have I missed? Let’s figure it out.

* I know it smarts. In my head I go ahead and say “horcruces,” too.

10 responses so far

What’s That Purple Stuff?

Mar 27 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Decontextualized

Is the question Christopher asked me last week, as he stood at the kitchen window and contemplated the vacant lot down the road. The trees in the vacant lot are dripping with Wisteria, and it’s gorgeous. In another week, it’ll be gross, with all the crusty dying vines choking the life out of the tree, but right now the breeze kicks the scent around and it smells like gardenia bushes perfumed up like an easy girl with a hot date. By the time the wisteria has died, the actual gardenias will begin blooming and then we’ll have even more beautiful smells, hot and soft and southern.

The hydrangea in the backyard.

The rocky shoal of an urban alley.

The Chinese wisteria in question.

4 responses so far

Lyra and her daemon moved through the darkening hall…

Mar 26 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Fandom

I took my first trip to a comic book store on Sunday afternoon. I know it. I wonder too, how I got to be 30 whole years old without having visited a comic book store. Anyway, I bought the first two Dark Tower books and the new season 8 of Buffy the Vampire Slayer comic and came home to find an IM from Shadowhelm telling me that there was double super secret His Dark Materials footage up. In between the time he sent me the link and my attempting to use it, they yanked it. It’s unfinished trailer footage from the company that’s doing the special effects, so there’s a bit of behind the scenes going on, which is just as cool as really seeing what the finished trailer will look like. Go watch. It’s very, very interesting.

Lyra’s London is beautiful. Lyra (must stop pronouncing it “Lee-ra” and get with “Lie-ra”) herself looks a little pleasant, not as snotty as the Lyra in my head. I think my favorite part, though, is watching Roger’s (I think it must be Roger; we don’t meet any other little boys in the first book) daemon change from a dog to a butterfly. There are so many interesting little snippets and I really want to know if they are what I think they are. There’s one clip that looks like a slice between the worlds– Grubman remembering? Looking ahead toward the knife? The bridge to the stars!? I’m still not thrilled with Lee Scoresby, but I’ll live with it.

For those of you who’ve read it, what do you think? Is it shaping up like you thought it would? Did you picture Iorek as an actual bear like he is here– and that CGI is amazing. Do you think Mrs. Coulter’s golden monkey daemon is any less nasty for not being golden yet?

If you haven’t read it, does it make you want to? I hope so. They’re fantastic books. Books for grownups, certainly, but fantastic nonetheless.

15 responses so far

Transcendence, Fetishization, and Diminishment, Now with Footnotes

Mar 23 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Lexpionage

Hooray for words, y’all! And this week, they’re guaranteed operetta free.

Yetro: 1) Adj: “so uncool it will never be retro”; 2) Noun: an uncritical exaltation of the future, looking forward toward unfound authenticity.

I admit, I was unaware of the second definition until I googled the word to see what else was out there, hoping that I had glommed on to some genuine lexpionage—that is, I espied this word before anyone else, or at least anyone else that doesn’t read Gizmodo on a regular basis. Come to find that the Encyclopedia Spuria has an entire entry devoted to Yetro and Yetrology. Yet the difference between the definitions is profound, akin to cleave‘s two equal and opposite meanings, though not as perfect.

Having studied them for upwards of ten whole minutes now, I think that the second definition is more apt. The first implies that it’s the inherent right of every gizmo or gadget (and by extension, everything else ever) to eventually transcend its purpose and usefulness to become retro, which entails a fetishization of the mores of its origin, including a nostalgic gloss of its culture and morality. One cannot determine yetro for an item of the moment, just as one can not determine which items are destined to become retro. So let’s strike the first definition and think of a better word for this phenomenon.

The second is a great way of encapsulating the impetus of Retrofuturism. I don’t think it’s synonymous with Retrofuturism, as that seems to be a movement in art and media, whereas Yetro can be that, as well as more. How should this version of yetro be any different from the vaguely threatening cockeyed-optimism of the simple minded? Not sure yet, really, except that most people, simple or not, have little to no sense of optimism about the future on a larger-than-personal sense. I get the idea that most people out there believe we’re all going to kill each other with carbon dioxide and dirty bombs. I prefer to think we’ll eventually wave to each other as we zoom around on our jet packs, going to and fro, and looking forward to returning to homes that have been shined and polished by friendly robots who would never pop out our eyes while we sleep. Friendly, helpful robots—they’re so yetro.

Mayhem: Willfully maiming or crippling a person; wanton destruction; a state of violent disorder or riotous confusion; havoc.

Obviously this isn’t a new word, but I wrote it down because I wanted to know its exact meaning and etymology. It’s orthographically unchanged from Middle English, and before that it was Anglo-Norman “mayhem,” from Old French “mahaigne” (verb form: mahaignier) and before that, Vulgar Latin “mahanare.” Nothing particularly remarkable there, except that sources note the Vulgate word itself was probably of Germanic origin, which is interesting—a Germanic word that went through the process of Romanization and evolution to become a different Germanic word.

It’s also part of a larger set of words I’ve been thinking of lately that are becoming overused and thus their meanings diluted. I had a professor in college who insisted no one use the word “terrified” unless we really meant terrified—that is filled with intense, overmastering fear, so afraid you were almost unable to act. She held that we were overusing the word and thus, diminishing its proscriptive meaning. I completely agree with her, but I constantly catch myself using hyperbole to tell more exciting, engaging stories and in this way, further diminishing other unique, useful words. Have I used the word “mayhem” lately? Absolutely. Has there been any actual mayhem in my life? Nope.

I’m concerned now that I am contributing to the diminishment of the richest vocabulary in the history of human speech.1 At the same time, I think it’s worthwhile to introduce lesser-known or –used words in approximate contexts to make sure they don’t fall out of use completely until they’re only used in the first chapters of Yetro novels to help people who don’t want to think tell what time period they’re supposed to be reading about.2

1 English will totally corner you in an alley, rough you up, and collect any of your lexicon that it wants. And then it will help you up and you’ll both chant “USA! USA! USA!” And you’ll be happy about it. And by “you” I mean, “some other language.”
2 See antimacassar.

2 responses so far

In Thoughtful Protest of Public Math

Mar 21 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Confession, Never Off the Record

Several weeks ago, Christopher and I spent and evening with Honu Girl and her husband and had a lovely, posh dinner and even better conversation. And then, while we were paying our respective bills for the evening, things took a distinct turn from sublime and into bizarre– the sort of bizarre that’s only bizarre until you realize you are so happy and so relieve and so at peace with the universe.

Christopher and I have a ritual of sorts. I do most of the paying, but he calculates the tips. I’m not very good with numbers. I actually still use my fingers to do basic arithmetic. Don’t scoff at me– some people just need visual aids. So whenever we get a check, I immediately pass it to him to fill in the tip, and then I can do the rest, though he has taken to forging my signature.

We then noticed that Honu Girl’s husband did the same thing to her– passed her the billet so she could figure up the tip. I sort of raised an eyebrow at them, knowing that they’re both fabulously educated and can walk around doing calculus in their heads. Her husband announced, “I don’t do math in public.”

And it made me ecstatic. Now I had an excuse to never again know the ignominy of being a public-math doing finger-counter! If he could say it, with his giant brain full of equations and formulas and three-dimensional radar graphs, could beg off figuring out the tip or anything else forever, so could I. And then I sort of forgot about it, because really, I don’t have to do it all that much.

Which bring me to yesterday, when Christopher and I had lunch at the pancake place in Five Points. It’s a pay at the counter affair and when it came time, I did my duty by stepping up to provide a signature, confident that he would do about the tip for me. But instead of handing us the slip and letting us do our own tipping and adding, lady just goes, “Do you want to add a tip to the card?” So we were standing there, and I froze up in the face of public mathematics. Christopher stared at the register, which showed a green total, for a few minutes before calmly declaring something like 17% of the total and the lady just tapped it in and signed and we were on our way.

“That,” he said, in a low voice full of derision, “is just another part of the plot to have us all doing public mathematics.” We both laughed, thinking of HG’s husband and his wonderful stand against the menace of co-ed calculation.

As we walked on, I asked, “Dear, what are some of the other parts of the plot.”

“Oh,” Christopher said, “you know. Like you have to figure the area under a curve before they let you leave the restaurant.”

“How do you figure out the area under a curve?”

“You have to know the equation of the line and then integrate it. And then multiply it by something. Or something. I can’t talk about it. We’re on a public street corner.”

18 responses so far

Just East of Birmingham on a Sunny Afternoon

Mar 20 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Decontextualized

Early last week the weather was perfect. It was one of the few days we get around here that was neither too cold nor too hot– and I use these terms loosely, as I think anyone who’s acclimated to Alabama is going to have a different concept of “too cold” than most anybody else. It was a gorgeous 70-something, with breeze, and sunshine, and swirling clouds. I grabbed my camera and set out down the street to see what I could see. Mostly I saw people commuting home, many of whom asked after me by shouting, “Hey baby!” Also, “Woo, Mama.” In fact, one guy in a rusted-out conversion van honked a very long time, then pulled a u-turn across a fairly busy road and pulled up along side me to shout, “Hey! Get in! How far are you goin’?” I, trying to keep the freak-out on the inside, said, “I’m just enjoying the weather!” So I continued on, enjoying the weather and the scenery, which included some really interesting graffiti, a thousand Bradford Pear trees, and the local landmarks.

God and Science, it says on the wall between buildings.

This was last week, a Bradford Pear tree in full bloom.  This week everything is covered in little white petals.

City Meats's neon is blue at night.

4 responses so far

Life Begins at Level 70

Mar 19 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Gaming

So I dinged 70 this weekend. I didn’t manage to capture a screenshot of it, because I was busy trying to force some Dwarf to give me gold for all the bat faces he made me collect. All the Burning Crusade propaganda claimed two things:

  1. It’s going to take as long to get from 60 to 70 as it did to get from 1 to 60.
  2. Life begins at 70.

Obviously the first one is patently untrue. The first 70, weaksauce tagger that he is, hit it about 24 hours after release. It’s actually fairly easy. I didn’t even try and I did it in about two months. So Blizzard needs to roll out that next expansion pronto. I need to get to level 80.

The second, that life begins at 70, I’m still wondering about but I think I can get on board. There are areas of Outland I haven’t seen and plenty of instances I haven’t run. I discovered a new flower to pick yesterday– big as my toon and sorta phallic looking: netherbloom. There are still tons of quests to do, and now that I can’t grind xp, they rate double gold. And that comes in handy, because I spent 1000g on my flying mount:

That's a big flying lion!

Technically I spent 800 to train up to the skill level where I could fly it. Then I spent 200 on the actual pixelated animal. I felt really weird about it, until Christopher (in sodding arrogant crow form, the hoser) led me to areas that you can’t get to via regular epic mount. You just can’t. So okay, flying mounts may be worth it after all.

That combined with winning the Incanter’s Trousers (Good stats; crap set bonuses) have made me think that there just might be something to continuing past 70. Got to find the rest of those pieces so I shave two-tenths of a second off my flamestrike. And I say this in all seriousnes: Z’oh my gawd. What the fuck? Barbeque! How about two whole seconds off my fireball? That’d be a bonus! Meanwhile, they’ve got decent stats and I can always use +18 to crit.

Next up, my Alchemy quests to become a Master of Elixirs so I can drown the guild in Elixir of Mastery. Christopher needs all the help he can get since The Great Druid Nerf of Two Weeks Ago That He’s Still Bitching About. He’s spending a lot more time in Cat form (hence the Mew Mew orders):

I see no QQ here.  Only large aggro.

Here he is “dancing.” He said, “Take my picture next to the totem!” So I took it. And then I gave it to you, internets, in hopes that you would get online and play.

6 responses so far

Dare You to Use These In Conversation Today

Mar 16 2007 Published by Sarah, etc. under Lexpionage

Two words from literature today, which relate to one another and similarly descriptive meanings. How is J.K. Rowling connected to Voltaire? Thusly:

Mugwump: Derived from the name given to those Republicans who refused to support their candidate James G. Blaine, in the 1884 presidential election. Grover Cleveland won the election, though not by an excessive amount. After that, it came to mean any person who was unable to make up his or her mind, especially in politics. The American Heritage dictionary gives the primary definition as anyone who acts independently or remains neutral, especially in politics, which has an entirely different, much more positive connotation than being unable to make up your mind. It’s derived from the Algonquian word “mugquomp,” meaning “great man” or “war leader.” Very strange how the results of the administration post election spun the word to a negative connotation (can’t choose) and then culture change over time is returning it to its original meaning– someone who holds himself apart from party politics.

And how did I come across mugwumpery this week? I was reading about Albus Dumbledore‘s titles: Order of Merlin, First Class, and Grand Sorcerer; Founder and Secret Keeper, Order of the Phoenix (OP6); Supreme Mugwump of the International Confederation of Wizards; Chief Warlock of the Wizengamot. I was curious to see if mugwump had an arcane or occult etymology and what do you know, it doesn’t. Put another tick in the Not Going to Hell for Harry Potter column. I think the Supreme Mugwump of the International Confederation of Wizards has the job of staying above the fray. And when you consider that the current fray in the wizarding world is eugenics, that’s a serious hover.

Panglossian: characterized by extreme optimism, especially in the face of hardship. When I encountered it this week, I knew what this word meant, and from whence it was derived. But I was so tickled to see it used and used correctly that I wanted to see what else I could learn about it. It’s from the character Pangloss in Candide by Voltaire, who is nothing if not extremely optimistic even in the most dire of circumstances. The name “Pangloss” comes from the Greek panglossia, meaning garrulousness or wordiness. Pan = all; Gloss = tongue / language. It’s interesting to note that Pangloss is Voltaire’s very successful skewer of Gottfried Leibniz. If it weren’t for Voltaire, when somebody asked you who invented Calculus, you’d say, “Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz, simultaneously and independently. We use Newton’s proofs and Leibniz’s notation.” But because of Voltaire’s wildly popular novel, what you know of Leibniz comes from the magnificent Baroque Cycle by Mr. Neal Stephenson, which has gone a long way toward rehabilitating the whole farrago.

In the Operetta Candide, Pangloss provides much of the exposition, but more than that, provides the hilarity. He earns his name in the first song, “The Best of All Possible Worlds” by teaching the “children” (Candide, Cunegonde, Maximillian, and Paquette) their lessons for the day, beginning, “Let us review lesson eleven, paragraph two, axiom seven: Once one dismisses the rest of all possible worlds, one finds that this is the best of all possible worlds.” It’s the theme of the entire novel. Later, though, is the shining example of it– between the songs “Auto Da Fe” and “You Were Dead You Know,” Pangloss has more or less returned from the dead, extremely syphilitic, to be run through the public contrition of the heretic (an auto da fe) and then hanged. He tells the crowd, “You can’t hang me! I’m too sick to die!” And the crowd asks, “Whadda ya mean, sick?” And Pangloss tells the story of contracting syphilis:

O my darling Paquette
She is haunting me yet
With a dear souvenir
I shall never forget.
‘Twas a gift that she got
From a seafaring Scot
He received, he believed
In Shallot.

and on and on in this cute little alternating rhyme scheme over the top of pizzicato viola, about the Swiss, ladies in Paris, a man from Japan, a moor from Iran, a young English Lord, a Milano Soprano, several other characters and a very far-ranging wasp.

Thus he happened to pass
Through Westphalia. Alas,
Where he met with Paquette
And she drank from his glass.
I was pleased as can be
When it came back to me;
Makes us all just a small family.*

So here’s Pangloss, dying of syphilis and willing to believe the chambermaid’s completely irrational tale of how she came to be so stricken because he liked her and he was getting some action. And when they finally determine that he is, in fact, guilty of heresy and should be hanged, Pangloss’s last words are, “God in His wisdom, made it possible to invent the rope!”

Is Pangloss a mugwump? Certainly. When life is that good, there’s no reason to take sides about anything. Is Dumbledore panglossian? Not as much, but he’d like you to think he is.

* I can sing the entire song from memory. “Candide” also taught me how to conjugate Latin verbs. Pangloss sings, “‘Tis war makes equal, as it were, the noble and the commoner. Thus war improves relations. Now onto conjugations. Amo. Amas! Amat!! Amamus!!!”
** Anybody wants any of these songs via mp3, just let me know and they’re yours.

No responses yet

Older posts »