Had a quick email this morning from Matt, with this illustration, one of the greatest ever.
I had seen it just a few minutes previous on a newsletter I subscribe to, but and was still sorta laughing about it. And I had laid out my thoughts about this no another journal, but then decided that all y’all really deserve a space in which to rant, so I’ll reprint those thoughts, almost in their entirety here, based on what I’d been talking about with friends this past Saturday night:
The revelation got the cogs turning. The Dumbledore we learned about in Half-Blood Prince and moreso in Deathly Hallows seemed to me to be sort of omnisexual. As a young man, brilliant beyond the telling of it, perhaps the most powerful wizard since Merlin, world at his feet, it seems that there should be no experience he wouldn’t be interested in. But okay, I have before and I will again set aside personal canon for actual canon. The Dumbledore of the first five books, though, just too old to be a sexual being. Perhaps it’s terribly ageist of me, but I have to think that after you turn 120, the sex drive just drops right off.
Regardless, I don’t think this revelation is as much about Dumbledore as it is about Rowling, and more to the point, Rowling’s irrational hatred for Snape. She said, when ovations at the revelation brought the house down, “If I’d have know it would make you this happy, I’d have told you sooner.” And that gives me pause. The thought goes, “She didn’t say anything sooner, because it wasn’t relevant to the plot.” But oh, it could have been! This is Rowling’s habit of telling, not showing, at its absolute worst. If Dumbledore was in love with Grindlewald, requited or not, that would make a huge impact on his world view, don’t you think? To have fallen in love with what we’re supposed to understand is serious evil, and to be tempted by malevolent beauty– that’s going to change a person. You’d think it would give you an extra level of insight when others, say your future Potions Master, prostrate themselves at your feet and admit to being seduced by evil in order to pursue love. And you’d think your first reaction, having been in that love, would not be, “You disgust me.”
And yet it was. Of course, Rowling’s Point of View machine gives us only Snape’s perspective here and certainly he must have been disgusted at himself at that point. So who knows what Dumbledore was really thinking. I’d like to think he was seeing a shade of himself as a young man, deceived by love and in utter anguish, his entire world falling apart. Because I can see that.
But moreso, I think Rowling just doesn’t want to talk about Snape anymore. She’s sick of him dominating her interviews, sick of repeating over and over again that he’s disgusting and awful and vindictive and horrible and should be left on the floor of the Shrieking Shack to rot. She’s sick of Snape fans being the most vocal and the most passionate. She’s pulling out the big guns to get people to focus on something, anything else already. She even mentioned Dumbledore’s orientation in relation to fanfiction, which immediately reminded me of one of the best pieces of Dumbledore fic I’ve ever read and who was his lover? SNAPE.
The other bits and pieces she released were that James and Lily Potter had no jobs as they lived off James’s wealth and were full-time fighters for the Order of the Phoenix. Sirius Black: idle rich, attempted murderer, torturer par excellence, emotionally stunted at age 18 (and still in a murderin’ mood). James Potter: semi-idle rich, torturer, prejudiced, paternalistic as all get out. Lily Evans: the world’s greatest grudge-holder. These are Rowling’s ideas of good people that we should admire. Brave, brave, brave, courageous, irrational, and intensely cruel.
And then there’s Severus Snape: poor, frightened, abused, tortured, ambitious and unfortunately seduced by the lure of Dark, as would anybody be who’d spent their life being beaten and denigrated by everyone. Snape, who didn’t have the luxury of dying young and had to confront his flaws and errors and his culpability in killing the woman he loved; who repented and crawled back to the side of Light, even though they despised and distrusted him; who did everything in his not inconsiderable power to revenge is love and care for her son, who hated and reviled him; who died still trying to do the right thing, still trying to be the good person he knew he was. That’s the character we don’t want to talk about because of how evil he was, how vindictive, how terrible.
And her straw castle of Gryffindors is falling down with each and every reread, so she has nothing to do but scream, “Pay no attention to the author behind the wizard!” Except that’s what the great and powerful really want, isn’t it. The second great perspective on this I’ve read is Harry Potter and the Author Who Wouldn’t Shut Up. Weiss makes a great point there. Because we couldn’t read any of this in the books, we had to invent our own ideas about Dumbledore’s past, which may or may not have included his loves and affairs and heartbreaks. It’s a great author who recognizes that readers do most of the work of storytelling and trusts readers enough to leave their imaginations alone and intact, rather than chipping away at them, as Rowling has started to do. With that in mind, she could have said that Dumbledore was a stamp collector or expert in haute cuisine or loved water skiing and had about the exact impact on the narrative.